An additional benefit of IVUS is that you can potentially minimize the amount of radiation and contrast the patient is exposed to while making that diagnosis. We need to consider the increased radiation costs to the patient and medical team when evaluating diagnostic technologies. "
Dr. Paul Gagne, MD, FACS, RVT
The Vascular Experts, Darien, CT
Changed plan from no treatment to stent placement
Changed number of stent planned
Changed plan from no treatment to other intervention
Changed plan from treatment to no treatment
The Core M2 is an easy-to-use, small footprint, digital IVUS imaging system, designed for peripheral vascular procedures and operable directly from the sterile field. The Core M2 vascular system is used for the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of vascular morphology in the coronary arteries and vessels of the peripheral vasculature. It is also indicated as an adjunct to conventional angiographic procedures to provide an image of vessel lumen and wall structures.
Philips IntraSight interventional applications platform is where IVUS imaging, physiology, co-registration2 and software come together to facilitate optimal patient care. IntraSight offers a comprehensive suite of clinically proven3-7 modalities, such as iFR/FFR, IVUS and co-registration2 to simplify complex interventions, speed routine procedures and provide improved patient care.
The venous educational resource portal offers downloadable resources to assist with procedural education and venous disease assessment, coupled with clinical evidence and practice capability collateral to share with your network.
Solutions for peripheral arterial interventions (PAD) procedures offered by Philips image-guided therapy.
Click here to learn moreSolutions for aortic procedures offered by Philips image-guided therapy.
Click here to learn moreEffective guidance in treatment and decision making for prostate artery embolization.
Click here to learn more Disclaimer Product availability is subject to country regulatory clearance. Please contact your local sales representative to check the availability in your country. References 1 Gagne PG, Tahara RW, Fastabend CP, et al. Venography versus intravascular ultrasound for diagnosing and treating iliofemoral vein obstruction. J Vasc Surg:Venous and Lym Dis. 2017;5:678-87. 2 Co-registration tools available within IntraSight 7 configuration via SyncVision. 3 Davies JE, et al. DEFINE-FLAIR: A Multi- Centre, Prospective, International, Randomized, Blinded Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Cost Efficiencies of iFR and FFR Decision-Making for Physiological Guided Coronary Revascularization. New England Journal of Medicine, epub March 18, 2017. 4 Gotberg M, et al., Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Versus Fractional Flow Reserve Guided Intervention (IFR-SWEDEHEART): A Multicenter, Prospective, Registry-Based Randomized Clinical Trial. New England Journal of Medicine, epub March 18, 2017. 5 Patel M. “Cost-effectiveness of instantaneous wave-Free Ratio (iFR) compared with Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) to guide coronary revascularization decision-making.” Late-breaking Clinical Trial presentation at ACC on March 10, 2018. 6 Maehara A, Matsumura M, Ali ZA, Mintz GS, Stone GW. IVUS-guided versus OCT-guided coronary stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2017;10:1487-1503. 7 Choi K, et al. Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Complex Procedures. JACC: Cardivascular Interventions. Mar 2019, 4281; DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.01.227.
Co-registration tools available within IntraSight 7 configuration via SyncVision.
You are about to visit a Philips global content page
Continue